Demolition management

Illustrative workflow. This example describes a management application Geova can develop around a project’s needs. Required documents, checks, responsibilities, and decisions come from the project’s process owners.

Before defining the system

Identify the sites or structures being managed, their location records, the responsible organizations, review roles, reference datasets, and the evidence that the process requires.

1. Establish the site record

Bring the site identifier, mapped extent, descriptive information, documents, and related project records together. Agree how the system distinguishes a site, a structure, and a visit to avoid mixing different record types.

2. Bring location into the review

Show the site alongside the relevant reference layers. Spatial questions can help reviewers inspect relationships, such as proximity to a configured utility corridor, with the source and distance made explicit.

Geova AI can assist with supported analysis and summaries. The application retains the responsible reviewer’s decision separately from the AI output.

3. Coordinate tasks and evidence

Assign tasks according to the agreed roles. Link review comments, documents, and field observations to the correct site. Define how missing information is returned and how revisions are checked.

4. Follow field activity

Connect inspection visits, photos, observations, and status updates to the site record. Field and office users should work from consistent identifiers and the permissions relevant to their roles.

5. Review completion

The authorized team reviews the required records and evidence, then applies the agreed completion status. Dashboards and handover outputs reflect the accepted project record.

Expected result

A coherent view of each site, its location, tasks, evidence, and decisions, with a traceable handover between field and office roles.

Questions to resolve in your project

• What is the main record, and which visits or tasks belong beneath it?
• Which information may each role see or change?
• How are corrections and conflicting observations handled?
• What evidence is required before each status transition?
• Which outputs does the receiving team need?

Continue with Define your system. This management example does not define demolition methods or replace the project’s professional procedures.